Last Updated on January 10, 2023
The Ultralight gaming mouse is a brand-new product on the market. These slim mice reduce mass wherever they can using honeycomb patterns and other techniques, resulting in a more maneuverable mouse that is simpler to aim. Following the initial launches of ultra-light mice by experts like Glorious and Finalmouse, many larger brands have created their own ultra-light mice with novel sizes, forms, and functionalities. Some of these mice even forsake the holey appearance, opting instead for an undamaged exterior shell and internal weight-reduction alterations. We’re prepared to offer our recommendations after thoroughly evaluating every ultra-light mouse in FPS games like Valorant and CSGO.
Note: Although the lightest mice frequently weigh much less, for the sake of this article, we define an ultra-light mouse to be any mouse that weighs 80 grams or less. Gaming mice with honeycomb bodies and those with conventional bodies can both be included.
Without further ado, the following are the best ultralight gaming mouse available today:
Our Top Picks: Ultralight Gaming Mouse
| The Best Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Weight | Price |
| Razer Viper V2 Pro | Best Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| Logitech G Pro X Superlight | Runner-up Best Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless | Best Upper Mid-Range Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| GLORIOUS Model I | Best Mid-Range Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| ROCCAT Kone Pro | Best Lower Mid-Range Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| Xtrfy M4 Wireless | Best Ergonomic Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| G-Wolves Hati S | The Lightest Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| Cooler Master MM720 | Best Budget Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
| Razer Viper Mini | Best Cheap Ultralight Gaming Mouse | Check Price |
Best Ultralight Gaming Mouse
Razer Viper V2 Pro
| Pros | Cons |
| 58 grams Extremely lightweight. Exceptional click latency. Comfortable symmetrical shape. Feet glide very smoothly on mousepads and desks. Build quality feels excellent. | Lacks a storage compartment for its wireless receiver. Somewhat bulky; isn’t designed to be stored in laptop bags or cases. Unlike previous versions, this mouse lacks side buttons on the right side for left-handed users. |
The Razer Viper V2 Pro is the top lightweight mouse. The most recent Viper model from Razer has the same cozy, symmetrical design as earlier editions in the series but is substantially lighter. With a weight of just 58g, this mouse is 16g lighter than the Razer Viper Ultimate from the previous generation, making in-game quick, accurate motions considerably simpler. The newly-released Focus Pro 30K sensor, one of the most accurate and reliable ones we’ve tested, is the model’s second most significant upgrade. This makes it the best option for playing competitive, fast-paced games.
Additionally, the click latency is incredibly low. It employs optical switches, like other Razer mice, which are intended to eliminate double-clicking problems that regular mechanical switches can have after extended use. Razer has eliminated some features from this model in order to make it so much lighter than prior models in the series. Rubber side grips, RGB lighting, and an add-on charging port are absent from this model. Furthermore, it only features side buttons on the left, as opposed to the majority of older models, which also have side buttons on the right.
The Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT weighs about the same if you’re looking for an alternative. The form of the Logitech is more adaptable to a wider range of hand sizes and grip types, although the Razer is generally well-suited for most hand sizes and grip styles. Although it is normally a little more expensive, it also provides exceptional click latency and sensor performance.
Logitech G Pro X Superlight
| Pros | Cons |
| 61 grams USB receiver storage. Exceptional click latency. Extremely light. Excellent build quality. Fully compatible with macOS and Windows. | Too large for small hands using fingertip grip. |
With the introduction of the 80 gram G Pro Wireless, which combines an effective optical sensor with a tiny, secure design and a fast-as-wired connection, Logitech pioneered the trend for wireless ultra-light mouse. A further development of the same idea is the Logitech G Pro X Superlight, which has the same essential components but a kerb weight of just 63 grams. In order to do that, Logitech has removed extraneous features like movable side buttons and RGB lights, leaving only the absolute minimum, which includes the original mouse’s sturdy, well-built feel.
Even at the present asking price of US $129, the design is unquestionably an achievement. Even while the original G Pro Wireless and other wireless mice with better value are available, the Superlight definitely outperforms them in terms of pure performance. Due to the Razer’s lower asking price, we’ve placed it just below that mouse in our rankings, but depending on your preferences for design, sensor, and software, either one might be a fantastic option. Black, white, and a pretty pink are the additional three color options for the Superlight.
Glorious Model O-
| Pros | Cons |
| 58 grams Very comfortable for those with small hands. Great low click latency. Extremely light. Glides around smoothly. | May be too small for those with large and extra-large hands. |
A fantastic ultra-light gaming mouse is the GLORIOUS Model O-. Many of the same features and performance are available in this even lighter and smaller version of the GLORIOUS Model O. It offers a very low click latency, a broad CPI range that can be changed in relatively small steps, and a high maximum polling rate. It glides through the air quite effortlessly because to the virgin-grade PFTE feet and the light cable. As it is intended, it is comfortable for people with small hands, but others with larger hands can find it unpleasant. Using the proprietary software—which, regrettably, is not compatible with macOS—you can program any button and control the RGB lighting.
For ultra-light gaming, the GLORIOUS O Minus is fantastic. It is quite lightweight, the feet make the mouse glide nicely, and the connection is superb. Additionally, it features a reduced click latency and a high maximum polling rate. Although designed for little hands, it is comfortable.
Glorious Model O
| Pros | Cons |
| 67 grams Low click latency. Feels very well-built and solid. Lightweight. Lightweight and flexible cable. | Isn’t suitable for small hands with any grip type. |
Thanks to a creative design that incorporates a number of contemporary trends, the Glorious Model O continues to be our choice for the finest gaming mouse available: a weight-saving honeycomb design, an incredibly flexible “shoelace” connection, a contemporary PMW 3360 optical sensor, and RGB lighting. Additionally, it earns high marks for being a very economical ultra-light.
A great ultra-light for gamers with medium to large hands is the Model O. The Glorious Model O-, which features the same design in a smaller size, is a perfect option for individuals with smaller hands or those seeking even lighter weights (58g for the Minus versus 67g for the vanilla Model O).
There is also the Variant O Wireless, which is more expensive than the wired model, a little heavier (69g), and provides a more pleasant gaming experience. The wireless technology used by Glorious is less advanced than that of Logitech and has a larger click latency, but you won’t notice this outside of testing facilities or esports competitions. For individuals with smaller hands, there is also a smaller Model O- Wireless.
SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
| Pros | Cons |
| 74 grams Lightweight. Feels well-built. Very good click latency. | Isn’t suitable for small hands using any grip type. Can’t adjust CPI settings as precisely as most high-end gaming mice. |
The SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless, which has four side buttons and a 180-hour battery life, is a fully functional but pricey lightweight mouse targeted for MMO and MOBA players.
It has Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless connectivity, making it a decent option for a variety of devices, but I discovered that if the mouse and USB-C dongle were more than a meter apart, the mouse would periodically lose connection, which I hadn’t noticed with other wireless mice in the same setup. Of course, to prevent this problem, you may purchase the wired SteelSeries Aerox 5 variant for a lot less money. It has a soft and flexible connection and weights less (66g).
Despite the wireless annoyances, a variety of gaming genres worked nicely with the 74g weight and gently ergonomic design. This puts it in the same category as the Glorious Model I, an ultra-light mouse with a high button count that focuses on comfort, though I’d tend to suggest the former due to its greater wireless dependability.
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless
| Pros | Cons |
| 60 grams Very low click latency. Extremely lightweight. Comfortable right-handed shape well-suited for most hand sizes and grip types. Excellent build quality. | Lacks a conventional bottom plate; underside is very open to dust and debris. |
The Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is the greatest lightweight gaming mouse at an upper mid-range pricing. It has a responsive, high-end sensor, excellent click latency, and a design that draws significantly on one of the most popular right-handed mouse designs ever made. However, it’s crucial to keep in mind that this form works best for hands that are larger in size. The Razer Viper V2 Pro is significantly more expensive, yet this mouse is only a few grams heavier and uses some rather innovative weight-saving construction techniques.
On the palm rest and in a few spots along the sides of the exterior body, there are tiny pill-shaped cutouts. Additionally, its baseplate is significantly more open than the solid plastic plates found on most mice. Although it may give the mouse a more delicate appearance, our testing revealed that it feels incredibly solid and well-built despite its looks, which may not be to everyone’s taste. Nevertheless, the layout does make the interior more susceptible to dust and detritus.
Razer Viper Ultimate
| Pros | Cons |
| 74.9 grams Well-built and almost universal design for all. Buttons and settings are easily customizable. Incredibly low latency. USB receiver storage within battery compartment. Fairly lightweight. | Not recommended for very large hands. Only small and medium hands can use it with a palm grip. |
Given its lengthy 70-hour battery life and non-ventilated construction with RGB illumination, the Razer Viper Ultimate is a surprisingly light wireless mouse. The mouse makes use of optical mouse switches, which were previously seen in Razer’s opto-mechanical keyboards. By doing away with the de-bounce delay, clicks are accelerated by a few milliseconds. The Focus+ sensor, which promises enhanced responsiveness by synchronizing the sensor’s reporting to the computer’s polling rate, is also fascinating. Behind all of this technical jargon, however, is a highly effective gaming mouse with a cozy shape and superior sensor, whose cost is only exceeded by that of the new Logitech G Pro X Superlight.
There is also a stunning Cyberpunk 2077 version that costs an extra $13 and replaces the original model’s black and green style with a brilliant yellow. If you like your mice to stand out, I’d say it’s well worth it!
There is also a wired model, the basic Viper, which is considerably less expensive and considerably lighter at 69g. This wired model also comes in the Viper 8K variant, which has a faster response time due to a jump in USB polling frequency from 1000Hz to 8000Hz.
GLORIOUS Model I
| Pros | Cons |
| 69 grams Lightweight. Excellent click latency. Feels comfortable and well-built. | Too big for small hands to use comfortably. |
The Glorious Model I is the best lightweight mouse we’ve tested in the mid-range. The majority of small, light mouse are made for fast-paced first-person shooter games, although more versatile, ergonomic ones are starting to emerge. Similar to well-known multi-genre gaming mice like the Razer Basilisk V3 and Logitech G502 HERO, this mouse sports an ergonomic, right-handed form. The biggest distinction is that this model weighs only about 70g, which is roughly 30g less than these other variants.
This mouse includes four side buttons, two of which are magnetic, allowing you to change their shapes or get rid of them completely. It has outstanding overall sensor performance and incredibly minimal click latency. Unfortunately, unlike the majority of other multi-genre possibilities, its scroll wheel lacks a free-scrolling mode and left and right tilt inputs. However, if you prefer a lighter, more ergonomic mouse with a lot of configurable inputs, this is a fantastic choice.
HyperX Pulsefire Haste
| Pros | Cons |
| 59 grams Low click latency. Very lightweight. Well-suited for most hand sizes with any grip type. | Only six programmable inputs. |
Although you wouldn’t know it by looking at the HyperX Pulsefire Haste and Pulsefire Haste Wireless mice, these are the brand’s first ultra-light mouse. Regarding functionality and design, these mice meet all requirements. A modern PixArt 3335 optical sensor, a hyper-flexible cable on the wired model, a safe form with ventilation on top but solid panels on the sides, and of course an exceptionally low weight of 59 grams are all features (on both wired and wireless, somehow).
The Haste feels sturdy and does not make any unwelcome noises or movements even when it is securely grasped. TTC Golden switches, which HyperX emphasizes are used under each mouse button, feel excellent, are responsive, and are comparatively light. It works well for fingertip or claw grippers with medium to big hands because of the shape, which is generally comparable to the Zowie FK series, Razer Viper, or Glorious Model O. These mice are reliable and did a great job in our testing, despite the fact that they lack a distinguishing characteristic or feature that may propel them into the must-buy category.
ROCCAT Kone Pro
| Pros | Cons |
| 62 grams Feels well-built. Exceptionally low click latency. Very lightweight. Comfortable right-handed shape with a shallow thumb rest. | No dedicated button to cycle CPI settings. |
We advise considering the ROCCAT Kone Pro, which is available for less than mid-range prices. This wired model’s pricing fluctuates a lot, but when it drops to approximately $40 or $50, it becomes a very affordable, lightweight option. The GLORIOUS Model I, our recommendation for a mid-range mouse, also offers a curved, ergonomic design for right-handed users. This form is a natural fit for palm or relaxed claw grips for most hand sizes and offers additional comfort that can help keep your hands from getting weary or hurting, even during longer gaming sessions.
Whether you play at a high competitive level or more informally, this mouse can give quick, responsive gameplay because both the sensor performance and click latency are excellent. Additionally, the left- and right-click buttons on this mouse include stunning RGB illumination that shines brilliantly through semi-transparent plastic. If you’re seeking for the lightest model you can find that doesn’t forgo aesthetic flair, this mouse stands out from the competition since it has this unusual feature on a lightweight mouse.
Roccat Burst Pro Air
| Pros | Cons |
| 81 grams Feels well-built and comfortable to use. Fairly lightweight. | Click latency isn’t as low as other FPS-oriented options. |
After the Kone Pure Ultra, Roccat’s first ultra-light mouse, came the Burst Pro Air and Burst Pro. This time, unlike the Pure Ultra, which had an ergonomic right-handed design, it has an ambidextrous design, like the Roccat Kiro, making it suited for left or right-handed use. When you plug in this mouse, you probably notice the cool subsurface honeycomb pattern first because it is lit up underneath by RGB lighting. This keeps out dust or moisture, which worries some buyers of ultra-light products, while still reducing weight and showcasing that awesome hexagonal design.
A silky and flexible cable, Pixart 3370 (wired) or 3389 (wireless) optical sensors, and Roccat’s own Titan optical switches—which we adored in their Vulcan mechanical keyboards—are just a few of the high-end features found in this product. The 81g weight for wifi and 68g weight for wired is respectably low, and the combination performs well in games. This is a solid option if you enjoy the design, and we do so quite a bit. This is especially true given the wired model’s enticingly low price. The wireless model is more enjoyable to use and has easy, albeit occasionally excessive, USB-C charging to recharge the battery.
SteelSeries Prime Mini Wireless
| Pros | Cons |
| 73 grams Feels very well-built. Fairly lightweight. Mouse feet glide very smoothly on desks and mousepads. | CPI button is on the bottom of the mouse, making on-the-fly changes awkward. |
My favorite new generation mouse from SteelSeries is the Prime Mini Wireless, which provides dependable wireless connectivity in a convenient 73g package. The Mini truly works for me, even though I have quite large hands. The form is a little odd, with a tiny front and wide base appropriate for claw or palm grips.
An effective optical sensor, a USB-C connection for convenient charging, and tactile optical-magnetic switches are all included inside. The mouse has a very solid feel in the hand and demonstrates how modern designs may attain astoundingly low weights without the usage of holes. The practical and user-friendly SteelSeries GG software allows you to customize the mouse, but once you’ve chosen your DPI settings and key bindings, you probably don’t need to have it loaded. Overall, it’s a highly impressive bundle that performs well.
The Prime Mini, a wired alternative that is far less expensive and only weights 61 grams, is also an option. Other than that, everything feels and looks the same. Given its flexibility, its cord isn’t too onerous for competitive gaming, but I still choose the wireless alternative these days – YMMV. Instead, have a look at the SteelSeries Prime, Prime+, and Prime Wireless mice that were previously introduced if you like a larger mouse.
Xtrfy M4 Wireless
| Pros | Cons |
| 71 grams Lightweight. Low click latency. Excellent build quality. | No software for customization. |
Although both the Xtrfy M4 Wireless and the Xtrfy M4 are excellent ultralight gaming mouse with a fantastic optical sensor and a pleasant ergonomic design for the right hand, we prefer the wireless model. With the exception of costing more, it only weighs five grams more, which seems like a tiny amount to pay given the flexibility that wireless mousing offers. A shoelace wire is included in case you wish to play while charging. The PixArt 3370 sensor drains power to allow the mouse to endure for almost a week of intensive use between (USB-C) recharges with RGB on and Xtrfy say 75 hours with RGB off.
A small screwdriver and an alternate top shell are also provided, allowing you to switch the wireless mouse’s shape between palm- and claw-friendly versions. There are even CAD files you can edit to 3D print the ideal version for you. Additionally, the battery can be moved forward or backward to fit your grip.
In my tests, the ergonomic shape of the mouse delivered solid performance, and the matte mouse’s holey sides added some much-needed additional texture to help with grip. The scroll wheel is on the softer end of the soft/tactile continuum, while the popular 8.0 GM switches from Kailh have pleasantly clicky action and little travel. The M4 Wireless employs the same bottom switch as the Xtrfy MZ1, enabling you to alter the RGB or DPI settings or have the mouse’s top button mapped to Page Down (to be linked into an in-game action). Everything makes perfect sense, and the Swedish company’s grasp of the long-standing presence of lightweight mice is demonstrated by these design decisions.
NZXT Lift
| Pros | Cons |
| 67 grams Lightweight Clean, minimalist design Lots of color options Well-designed software | Feels flimsy Understated RGB lighting Price is just too high for what’s offered |
Despite the fact that NZXT is best known for their computer cases and water coolers, the firm is starting to delve into the accessories market with keyboards and mouse. The Lift is their brand-new mouse, and it’s a surprisingly good first effort with a 67g symmetrical design, premium PixArt 3389 sensor, Omron mechanical switches, paracord-sheathed cable, and a variety of color options—most retailers only offer black and white, but NZXT’s website also offers blue, purple, cyan, red, and yellow. The Lift’s form is similar to the Razer Viper, which is not a bad thing, but the CAM software and subpar side mouse buttons (on one side only) prevent it from challenging the RGB king.
This could be a fantastic option for anyone who enjoys the simple NZXT appearance and wants a cozy introduction to lightweight mice with a slight reduction in price from its current asking price.
Xtrfy M42
| Pros | Cons |
| 59 grams Excellent build quality. Very lightweight. Low click latency. Modular back panels. | No software for customization and no programmable buttons. Only eight CPI preset options. |
The Xtrfy M42 is a more compact version of the company’s older M4 that is ambidextrous. It ranks well for its top-spec Pixart 3389 sensor, all-around RGB illumination, and a super-flexible cord, making it one of the best ultra-light mice for small to medium hands we’ve tested. The M42 is special in that you may choose between a raised and less noticeable bump by switching between the two available back panels. It’s really cool to see that you can 3D print your own design using files from the Xtrfy website.
Similar to the M4, the M42 is offered in five variations: black, white, blue, pink, and a special retro shade, making it one of the brightest gaming mice on the market.
Endgame Gear XM1r
| Pros | Cons |
| 70 grams Excellent build quality. Amazing sensor performance. Very low and consistent click latency. Ultra-lightweight. | No programmable inputs. |
A PixArt 3370 sensor, ultra-thin PTFE mouse feet, Kailh 8.0 switches, and an incredibly flexible cable are just a few of the high-quality parts found throughout the Endgame Gear XM1r mouse. In high-pressure scenarios like CS:GO, I often need a few days to get used to a new mouse, but the ambidextrous form, matte finish, and clicky buttons of the XM1r were perfect for me right away. (There are three more styles in addition to the white matte type I tested: black matte, see-through black glossy, and see-through black matte.)
Keep in mind that the previous XM1 is still usable. The PixArt 3389 sensor and Omron switches used in this model are the only differences between the mice; all other components and finish options are the same.
Fnatic Bolt
| Pros | Cons |
| 69 grams Comfortable, symmetrical shape that’s well-suited for most hand sizes. Very lightweight. Excellent click latency. | A few minor build quality issues, though they don’t affect overall performance. |
The Fnatic Bolt is the first ultra-light mouse from the London-based esports team that we’ve seen, but it does a lot of things well. Although the 69g weight is light for a mouse this size, the Bolt does not rely on the honeycomb design, which has been shown to be unpopular with more mainstream buyers.
The Bolt also features the well-regarded Kailh 8.0 switches and the reliable PixArt 3370 optical sensor. The design is comfortable and ambidextrous, but lacks side buttons on either side, making it insufficient for left-handed users. The modest RGB illumination in the scroll wheel contributes to the scroll wheel’s respectable battery life, which is rated at 110 hours for 2.4GHz and 210 hours for Bluetooth. A included paracord wire is used to charge the USB-C port. The only drawback is that the 2.4GHz wireless dongle cannot be inserted into the mouse itself, making it preferable to use at home rather than while traveling.
Even at its somewhat high price, the Bolt gets a recommendation because to its good weight, shape, build quality, and sensor.
Xtrfy MZ1 (Zy’s Rail)
| Pros | Cons |
| 56 grams Feels very well-built. Very lightweight. Great click latency. | No onboard memory. No software for customization; only eight CPI presets. Fairly bulky; may not fit into most laptop cases. |
The Xtrfy MZ1 is a special mouse created by seasoned mouse reviewer Zy. It stands out thanks to its distinctive appearance and high-quality Xtrfy components. This mouse is remarkably comfortable to hold despite being rather short and flat thanks to design features like a noticeable back hump, deep comfort curves in the buttons, and contoured sides. That holds true even for those with pretty large hands, however there is a small learning curve because of how you grip the mouse, which is inherently different from most others I’ve tested.
I adore that there are no holes in any of the gripping regions, and that Xtrfy sealed the interiors to prevent them from dust and water. I have no concerns about the build quality of this mouse, other than the fact that it creaks slightly when gripped tightly and that the cord has a small amount of fraying where it rubbed against a cheap mouse pad’s sharp edge. There is no need for software; the mouse can be fully set using on-board controls.
By default, you can modify the lighting’s effect, color, brightness, and speed as well as the lift-off distance, debounce delay, and DPI setting. This is effective, and the key used to make the majority of the modifications may later be configured as the F11 key, making it useful for use in games.
Speaking of games, the MZ1 is a superb performer in FPS games like Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War and Counter-Strike, with the ability for both quick flick shots and stable tracking thanks to its low weight (56g), Kailh 8.0 switches, and most recent Xtrfy flexible cable. From levels 0 to 100 of the Black Ops Season 4 campaign, I used it exclusively, and it consistently outperformed some of my all-time favorites, like the Razer Viper Ultimate, Logitech G Pro X Superlight, and Glorious Model O.
This mouse, in my opinion, is one of the most competitive options available at the moment, if you can get past the initial hurdle of the unique design and slightly different grip style. I’ll just add that I’m really anticipating Xtrfy and Zy’s upcoming project.
Mountain Makalu 67
| Pros | Cons |
| 67 grams Feels very well-built. Low click latency. Very lightweight. Mouse feet glide very smoothly on mousepads and desks. | Cable feels high quality, but isn’t as flexible as those on some other lightweight mice. |
The Mountain Makalu 67 is one of a new generation of ultra-light mice made to provide the low mass that certain gamers seek without sacrificing strength. The mouse employs a two-layer mesh with slats, or “ribcage” design, from Mountain instead of hexagons, and it does produce a stiffer-feeling mouse with less flex than other ultra-lights. Other contemporary features include a PixArt PAW 3370 sensor, which, unexpectedly, outperformed the already great PixArt 3389 in my testing because to its shorter lift-off distance and reduced error rate. Other parts, including the mouse button and scroll wheel, are made with high-quality materials and have a satisfying feel.
A ring of illumination surrounds the scroll wheel area rather than emanating from the vented body, which is a little more practical lighting than we’ve seen on some of the Makalu’s rivals. Another ingenious feature is the DPI system, which employs four tiny white LEDs to indicate which of the four DPI settings you are currently using. This makes it simple to access the desired setting without repeatedly jiggling your mouse. The Mountain Base Camp software’s DPI and other settings can be changed (oh, branding!).
This form is also intriguing. The Makalu is a sizable mouse that is 127mm long and 70mm across, with a tall bump in the middle that fits comfortably in your hand. It is simple to pick up thanks to the side ridges, however I would have preferred ‘comfort curves’ on the left and right mouse buttons. The form is sturdy and ought to work for anyone who prefers right-handed ergonomic designs.
The mouse feels virtually wireless as a result of the excellent, highly flexible mouse cable, which is wonderful. I’d think anyone with medium to large hands will find this mouse to be most comfortable. Try the Makalu if you like the way it looks; even if it’s not created by a well-known manufacturer, it’s obvious that Mountain’s goals are anything but conventional.
In addition to pledging to assist Plastic Bank in removing 25,000 kg of plastic from the ocean, Mountain has made an effort to minimize the use of plastic packaging. Naturally, this has no bearing on gameplay, but it might give you a pleasant, fuzzy feeling inside.
Cooler Master MM710
| Pros | Cons |
| 52 grams Very lightweight. Excellent performance. Software allows for a ton of customization. Ambidextrous design is good for all grip types. | Too small for people with larger hands. Side buttons can be activated by squeezing the mouse frame below them, which is concerning. |
The Finalmouse Ultralight 2 is lighter, although it was only available for a brief period of time. The Cooler Master MM710 is another great alternative, featuring a distinctive stubby shape and the least weight on a generally accessible mouse. The MM710 is a smart choice for claw grip players because of its tall hump at the back, which fits naturally into the bottom of the palm to offer more comfort and control than is available with a flatter mouse.
The MM710 does not have RGB lighting in any way, which is unusual in 2022 but does result in a small weight and cost savings. This is a wonderful option for gamers with virtually any hand size because to its short but wide dimensions.
The MM711, which adds RGB lighting and is more expensive and slightly heavier than the MM710, is also offered in a variety of colors and finishes. We discovered that it delivered the same superior performance as the MM710 and that its additional 10 grams made it more comparable in weight to other extremely light choices. The MM711 is a high-end mouse worth consideration if RGB illumination is crucial.
Cooler Master MM720
| Pros | Cons |
| 49 grams Very comfortable. Very low click latency. Extremely light. Glides smoothly. | Scroll wheel can’t be unlocked for infinite scrolling. Can’t be used wirelessly. |
The Cooler Master MM720 features a sculpted, ultra-wide design that is incredibly comfortable for hours on end, making it unquestionably the most odd mouse on this list. The exaggerated form of the mouse made it a little more difficult to use, but once you get used to it, its incredibly low weight of 49 grams and flexible cord make it a good option for FPS flicks. The MM720 is also unusual in that it uses LK optical switches rather than the more widely used Omron, although in my tests, I couldn’t tell the difference.
There is no side flex in this case, and the mouse feels extremely sturdy in the hand. I’m not sure if this is because of the form, the relatively small holes, or other design features. The scroll wheel is the only area I find lacking because it is so smooth; personally, I like more pronounced, tactile steps, but your experience may be different. This is a wonderful mouse to check out if you prefer a claw or fingertip grip, especially if you liked the CM Xornet or Spawn.
The Cooler Master MM720 is an exceptional ultra-light gaming mouse overall. With its honeycomb construction, it feels fairly well made and is incredibly light. With the exception of people who have really large hands, the right-handed design is quite comfortable and functions best for people who use a claw grip.
On mousepads or surfaces, the virgin-grade PFTE feet and the paracord-like cable contribute to a smooth glide. It features a very high maximum polling rate, a very short click latency, and most of its buttons are programmable. Additionally, you can change the CPI range in steps of 100.
Cooler Master MM731
| Pros | Cons |
| 59 grams Feels well-built overall. Extremely lightweight. Low click latency. Comfortable, right-handed shape suitable for all grip types. | Bulky; may not fit in most laptop cases. Mouse feet are thin compared to most gaming mice. CPI only adjustable by increments of 100. |
The Cooler Master MM731 is an excellent mouse that was plagued by some early QC problems, including worries about the build quality and input latency that appear to have been resolved*. Despite this, the mouse is still well worth considering because of its cozy design, amazing specifications, and satisfying software environment.
First off, the MM731 is a tri-mode mouse with a modern USB-C flexible cord that can be utilized with low latency 2.4GHz wireless, greater latency Bluetooth for mobile devices, and wired connections. This solid-bodied wireless device weighs only 59 grams, which is exceptionally light. However, there is a wired-only model, the MM730, that is both lighter and less expensive.
The body has a long, sloping design that is ergonomically pleasing for right-handed people, with a small hump around three-quarters of the way back. With a matte black finish and little decoration other from the RGB-lit Cooler Master hexagonoid, the overall appearance is fairly professional.
This software, dubbed MasterPlus, is brand-new to CM and has all the features you could possibly require. I really enjoy that you may access four more tasks, such as executing macros, changing the lighting’s color, or switching profiles, by holding down the middle mouse button while clicking the left, right, back, or advance buttons. It’s a thoughtful addition that more companies than just Cooler Master and Roccat should make. It’s an impressive package all around.
*Early models apparently had bodies that flexed and buttons that squeaked, and the firmware had a longer-than-normal input delay. Cooler Master seems to be treating the problems gracefully, exchanging those early devices for free replacements with newer, higher-quality ones and enhancing the firmware to lessen or completely eliminate the input delay. An interesting CM official informed me that if your mouse is affected, you should get a replacement as some early models may not have their input delay issue fixed by the firmware upgrade.
Razer Viper Mini
| Pros | Cons |
| 60 grams Very lightweight. Outstandingly low click latency. Superb sensor performance. Great cable with minimal kinks and drag. | Small design may not be comfortable for larger hands. CPI range isn’t as wide and adjustable as most Razer mice. |
A great wired gaming mouse is the Razer Viper Mini. It is one of the lightest mouse we have tried so far and is the little version of the regular Razer Viper. Its sensor performance may not be quite as outstanding as that of the other mice in the Viper range, but it is still excellent, and its exceptionally low click latency guarantees a responsive and lag-free gaming experience. Any hand size should be able to utilize it with this grip type because of its compact size, which is perfect for a fingertip grasp. Sadly, it has less additional side buttons than the other Viper mouse, but on the plus side, each button can be customized.
With a PixArt 3359 optical sensor, low latency optical switches, and RGB lighting packed into a conventional (no-hole) design weighing only 60 grams, the Razer Viper Mini is an exceptional performer at its price range. Smaller hands may palm the mouse with ease, while small and medium hands will enjoy the excellent feel of the mouse in fingertip or claw positions. Another advantage is the soft cable, albeit it isn’t quite as flexible as what Glorious, for example, offers. Excellent value may be found in the Viper Mini ultra-light mouse.
FAQs
A method for determining hand size for a gaming mouse
The comfort of a mouse will depend on how big your hands are. A matching mouse may be the ideal option if you have exceptionally large or small hands because the majority of ultra-light mice will be completely functional for the overwhelming majority of hand sizes. Keep your fingers together and measure from the tip of your longest finger to the wrist to determine the size of your hands.
- Small hands: Less than 170mm (6.7″)
- Medium hands: Between 170 and 195mm (6.7″ – 7.7″)
- Large hands: More than 195mm (7.7″)
The width of your hand can also be determined by measuring it from the base to the point just past the tip of your thumb. You can contrast the length and width of these two hands with the mouse you’re thinking about buying. Your hand size should be able to accommodate a mouse that is around 60% larger in both dimensions.
For instance, since my hand is 200 mm × 100 mm, I prefer mice that are about 120 mm x 60 mm in size. Your ideal mouse size can also vary depending on how you hold the device; palm grips, which are flatter than claw and fingertip grips, are more comfortable with mice that are closer to 70% of your hand size.
Will dirt not get into the mouse holes?
It is irrelevant in my opinion. Since 2020, I have been testing ultra-light mice, and even my oldest mice have no sign of visible dust or dirt. Additionally, I haven’t seen any improvement in performance over time. If I do, I’ll make the necessary updates to this article.
Additionally, the only moving parts like button switches that are often covered up are a PCB and perhaps RGB lights, so there aren’t really any components under the holes that would be harmed by dirt. Although I wouldn’t advocate doing so with an ultra-light mouse, I also wouldn’t advise doing it with any other type of computer accessory. Consider conventional full-body mice like the Roccat Kone Pure Ultra, Endgame Gear XM1, or Logitech G Pro Wireless if you’re worried about this.
Are ultralight mice worth it?
Yes, I would agree. Fast-paced first-person shooter (FPS) and battle royale games, where precise and quick aim is crucial, will benefit the most from a lighter mouse. All of the medium to big ultra-light mice I’ve tested have been comfortable for regular computer use aside from these games.
The Finalmouse Ultralight 2 and the high-end Logitech G Pro Wireless are two examples of extremely expensive ultra-light mice, but there are also many more reasonably priced choices that are close to the mark. If this is the case for you, it’s well worth checking out one of the ultra-light mice we’ve highlighted just to see how you like it. Many retailers will accept returns within a specific time window if the mouse is in a saleable condition.
What makes a lightweight mouse preferable?
Competitive gaming benefits greatly from a lightweight mouse. For FPS games, the reduced weight makes it simpler to stop and enables quicker flings and swipes over the mousepad. A lighter mouse is simpler for these types of movements because some players prefer to elevate the mouse while they play, especially if they utilize a lower in-game sensitivity.
What qualifies as a light mouse?
According to widespread agreement, a gaming mouse must weigh less than 80g in order to qualify as a lightweight model. Standard gaming mice typically weigh more than 100g.
